Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
- Meggy Grosfeld
- Feb 8
- 2 min read
Okay, full honesty: I finished this book weeks ago, back in early January. Now it’s the first week of February, and I’m only just sitting down to write about it. I think I was so disappointed that I couldn’t find the motivation to put my thoughts into words. But I’ve realized that I owe it to myself, and to my bookshelf, to stay consistent. Holding myself accountable was one of my goals for 2026, and that means showing up even when a book doesn’t live up to my expectations.

Anyways, Fahrenheit 451. You’d think I would’ve loved this one, especially since I enjoyed The Handmaid’s Tale and other dystopian novels, but this one just didn’t land for me in the same way. The concept itself is fascinating: a society where firemen don’t put out fires, they start them, burning books as television takes over and reading becomes outlawed. Really cool concept!! But I absolutely disliked the writing style.
The writing style really threw me off, not because the ideas were confusing, but because of the literal language on the page. The sentence structure and phrasing felt strange and hard to follow. Maybe it’s because the book was written over sixty years ago, but honestly, that’s not that long ago. At times, Bradbury’s descriptions felt more complicated than they needed to be. Take the Mechanical Hound, for example, I struggled to picture what it actually looked like, and his writing didn’t give me enough clarity, so I ended up Googling it just to get a visual. The same thing happened during the scene where Montag is running through the streets. I genuinely couldn’t tell where he was going or how he ended up at Faber’s. I had to read and reread the passage just to piece it together, and even then it felt like I was trudging through a pool of run-on, overcrowded sentences. Guy Montag, where the hell are you going??!!
With dystopian novels, description is everything for me. You’re stepping into a world that isn’t your own, almost like fantasy, so readers need strong, clear details to understand how that world works. I found myself constantly tripping over Bradbury’s word choices, which made it harder to fully immerse myself in the story he was trying to build.
Overall, I don’t regret reading it. I found it especially interesting when thinking about our world today, the media we consume and the way literacy rates among children seem to be declining rapidly. It also made me reflect on how people my age don’t read as much as we probably should, and how easy it is to let screens replace books without even realizing it. I hope we all don't slowly turn into Mildred and her on screen family...maybe some of us already have....
I wouldn’t say it’s a bad book, it’s just not one of my favorites. I found myself wanting more explanation: why are the books being burned? Who’s actually in charge? How did this society end up this way? And don’t get me wrong, I love a book that throws you in medias res and leaves you a little disoriented at first, but here I really wanted more context and detail to ground me in the world.


